Where do you want to be invested when faced with the prospect of a bear market? Some say that high dividend yields provide protection when stocks fall. This implies that since the yield rises as the stock price declines, new buyers will be attracted as the price drops. Such buyers could help establish a “floor” below the stock. While this sounds good in theory, we find scant evidence that it actually works in practice.

This strategy fails when needed most because “high yielders” tend to be fundamentally weak. While some high-yielding stocks may be good bargains, most high yields reflect poor quality or poor growth prospects. We believe that owning the most flexible, durable, and predictable high-quality stocks during a downturn tends to be a better option.

High Yield Tends to be Low Quality

We crunched some data to test the idea that high-yielding stocks tend to be low-quality.

First, we categorized the 1,000 largest U.S. companies into “buckets” based on quality and yield. We assigned grades “A” through “F” for quality based on profitability, consistency, and indebtedness. We tracked the performance of each quality grade bucket. More profitable, more consistent, and lower debt companies earned higher marks, while less profitable, less consistent, higher debt companies earned lower marks.

Next, we ranked the same companies by dividend yield, placing higher yield stocks into a “High Yield” bucket and lower yield stocks into a “Low Yield” bucket. We excluded stocks without dividends and tracked the performance of each category grouped by dividend yield.

Lastly, we compared the composition of the quality buckets by dividend yield category. Chart A below shows that high-quality companies tend to carry lower yields, and low-quality companies have high yields. Within the “A” Quality bucket, 83% is low yield, and 17% is high yield. The “F” Quality bucket is made up overwhelmingly of “High Yield” stocks (79%) and only 21% “Low Yield.” Thus, the more companies a portfolio holds with high yields, the more likely it is that the portfolio also has a lower-quality (aka. “higher risk”) tilt.

As you are about to see, this low-quality tilt can increase risk in a market selloff.

Chart A

When Going Gets Tough, Go With High Quality

Pivoting away from high yield, which can lead to low quality and risk, is the first step in addressing the “high-yield is safe” error. With a focus now on fundamentals, we see that the nature of a business and how it is financed means far more than yield, especially during tough times.

During the past three market crises, high quality has held up far better than both the market and low quality (Chart B).

Chart B

Let’s walk through each:

1) The Technology Wreck (2000-2002)

This episode brought pain to the NASDAQ and the overall market. Before the slide, low-quality “F” stocks yielded 2.7%, versus 1.7% for high-quality “A” stocks. Yet, the higher-yielding low-quality “F” stocks fell by 43% from May 2001 through October 2002. By contrast, the lower-yielding “A” quality stocks fell by just 26%.

2) The Global Financial Crisis (2007-2009)

The Global Financial Crisis took the market down sharply again. When the market was down about 56% from July 2007 through March 2009, the lower quality higher-yielding “F” Quality stocks were down 70%. Over the same period, the “A” Quality stocks fell an average of 45%, resulting in a 25% outperformance versus “F” Quality. The fact that low-quality stocks’ average yield rose to 6.1% by 2008 was little recompense for the damage done.

3) The COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)

When the pandemic began in 2020, the market was again tested. Stock market averages fell more sharply than almost any other time in history. In days, the market (Russell 1000 Index) was down 39%, while “F” Quality stocks fell an average of 49%. Over the same period, “A” Quality stocks dropped an average of 32%, outperforming the overall market and lower-quality, higher-yielding stocks.

Conclusion

As you can see, while a high dividend yield may occasionally point to value, it usually means low-quality fundamentals and more risk. Thus, we caution against over-emphasizing high dividend yield and focusing instead on quality.

Given the years of run-up from the Global Financial Crisis through today, now may be the right time to emphasize high quality for its better defensive characteristics.