There is lots of discussion about the return of speculation. Cryptocurrencies, message board short-squeezes, soaring penny stocks, “blank check” companies, and record issuance of risky debt dominate today’s headlines. It is hard to imagine that, just under a year ago, financial markets were in freefall. Greed replaced fear in the span of a few short months, despite an ongoing pandemic. This week we return our focus to “quality” as a key factor in portfolio construction.

Risk-On!

Notice the chart below. It is a ratio of the most volatile stocks in the S&P 500 divided by the least volatile. When investors are feeling good and loading up on risky stocks, the line rises, and when fearful or uncertain, it falls. Over time, it tends to revert to the mean. Notice how, after November 5, the line shoots straight upward. This “risk-on” condition coincided with both the election and debut of a promising vaccine. These factors, combined with more stimulus expectations, have driven risk appetite to levels not seen in years.

Chart A

Performance of High Beta vs. Low Beta Stocks

Binging on Low Quality

Amid the buying frenzy, a growing number of investors are willing to pay the highest prices for the lowest quality investments. The average yield on U.S. junk bonds dropped below 4% for the first time a week ago, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report. This milestone makes little sense and is why we remain underweight low-quality bonds in tactical asset allocation portfolios. It is also a sign that the forward return for low-quality investments is likely not what it used to be, as yield hungry investors binge on this lowest quality debt.

How We View Quality

Of first importance is the “quality” of an investment. Without it, how can we even begin to figure out whether an investment’s price makes sense? Of course, there are many different definitions of quality. Still, unlike beauty, quality need not be only in the “eye of the beholder.” We can go a long way to quantify it objectively if we ask the right questions.

To us, “quality” is nearly synonymous with “durability.” We come close to capturing this idea by examining a company’s profitability, consistency, and leverage. We expect companies with highly profitable assets to survive better than companies with low profitability during tough times, for example. Similarly, we suspect companies that regularly generate steady cash to be more durable than ones with unpredictable cash flow, especially in tough times. Lastly, more conservatively financed companies with low debt are more likely to endure than those saddled with lots of weighty obligations. Thus, a “quality” firm to us is one with highly profitable assets, consistent cash flows, and low leverage, all else being equal.

The last year has been a “tale of two markets,” defined mainly by quality. The chart below shows the average price performance of the highest and lowest quality publicly-traded companies in the United States, as judged by Washington Crossing Advisors. To determine quality, we ranked the 1,000 largest along the three dimensions outlined above (profitability, consistency, and leverage). Next, we assigned those companies ranked in the highest 20% across all three areas to Washington Crossing’s (WCA) “High Quality” group. The lowest 20% were assigned to the Washington Crossing “Low Quality” group. We tracked the day-to-day performance of each group’s average, equally-weighted price performance (Chart B, below).

As you can see, the WCA “Low Quality” group recently surged ahead of the WCA “High Quality” group. It is important to note that the overall volatility was far higher over the whole period for lower quality. The “Low Quality” group suffered much more profound losses during the selloff last spring, with losses nearly double that of “High Quality.” As markets swing from fear to greed and back again, the pendulum swings also seem to turn back and forth between low and high quality. Lately, momentum has favored “Low Quality” over “High Quality.”

Graph B

“High” vs. “Low” Quality Recent Performance

January 2020 to February 2021

The Time is Now

While quality may be out of style relative to popular momentum and yield plays for the moment, we are confident the cycle will eventually reverse. For risk-averse investors or investors holding high-momentum stocks, it may pay to focus now on the quality of portfolio holdings. With “high-quality” recently lagging behind “low-quality” stocks, now could be the right time to add higher-quality, lower-momentum investments. History has shown that “quality” has highly desirable characteristics in flat-to-down markets but tends to lag in strongly-trending markets.

As the world again becomes enamored with “fast money,” we remember the lessons of past bull markets and remain steadfast in our commitment to the enduring and oft-overlooked characteristic of “quality.”