It is now all about earnings. Surging capital spending has been the main driver of profit expectations and the stock market. Despite all the worry about oil, Iran, stagflation, and AI Disruption, the forward view of earnings is still strong and the S&P 500 trades at a higher than average multiple of expected earnings. Since earnings growth has driven about two-thirds of the gain in the S&P 500 post 2019 and almost all of the gain since the end of 2024, what happens over the upcoming earnings season should be of utmost importance (see Chart A). Expectations are high as analysts are looking to extend the profit growth winning streak to six straight double-digit EPS gains in a row.

Chart A: S&P 500 Earnings Forecasts vs Trend

It is abundantly clear that spending on artificial intelligence and related infrastructure is reshaping the landscape. Since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022, capital expenditures on datacenters, energy infrastructure, and semiconductors have exploded (chart B, below). Global technology spending growth was over 12% last year, one of the strongest growth levels in the past 25-30 years, according to S&P Global.  As businesses spend to expand, these capex dollars are recycled into profits because investment by one company becomes revenue for another, turning spending on data centers, semiconductors, and power infrastructure into profits across corporate America. Capital spending feeds the profit cycle, reinforcing expectations for growth, and fosters the risk appetite necessary to fund investments. Surging investment in artificial intelligence is driving the cycle today much like railroads did in the late 1800s, electrification did in the 1920s, and the internet did in the 1990s. Each era produced a wave of infrastructure spending that lifted profits across the economy. While AI technology is new, the phenomenon of investment-led profit and credit growth is not. 

Chart B: S&P 500 Capital Expenditure Growth Leading Earnings (Profits)

Increasingly, investments in artificial intelligence require financing beyond operating cash flow. Hyperscalers are increasingly turning to debt and leases to finance AI capacity. Ratings agency S&P Global forecasts the five largest companies in this arena (Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, Oracle) will spend over $700 billion this year, and the present value of hyperscaler lease obligations is also estimated to be near $700 billion. Fortunately, these same companies, in total, produced more gross cash flow than capital expenditures, but the speed of capital deployment, coupled with wide ranging uncertainty about the ultimate profitability of the investments, raise both risk and opportunity.

The risk cuts both ways. If a hyperscaler fails to invest enough, it risks falling behind competitors. But if it invests too aggressively, it risks creating excess capacity and writing down investments later. In our view, most CEOs are of the opinion that underinvestment is the bigger risk, which means that risks are likely skewed to producing overcapacity, falling prices, and write-downs once the AI capex Supercycle crests. These developments do not appear priced into credit markets as credit spreads among the highest risk borrowers remain in the lowest decile relative to historic spreads (Chart C, below).

Chart C: High Yield Corporate Spreads in Lowest Decile (Percentile Ranking of OAS High Yield Corporate Bond Spread)

Markets can struggle when investment booms collide with tightening credit conditions. Following a period where confidence has been running exceptionally high, energy and credit are introducing a new risk case. $100+ oil and widening spreads in high yield could throw a monkey wrench into the outlook. This is why the S&P 500 is finding it hard to move to higher ground despite an otherwise good economy. Even before the beginning of the Middle East conflict, which is currently shutting in large amounts of global crude production and shipments, there were signs of pressure in credit markets. As Chart D shows, the spread for high-yield corporate issuers began to rise from record lows in January.

While hard to see in the chart, the spread reached a near record low on January 21st at 2.5%. Today, that spread stands near 3%, a 50 basis-point increase off the lows. While far from a blow-out, the broader credit environment is also showing some sign of pressure. Financial stocks are down 10% since the start of the year, and troubles at fast growing private credit managers are grabbing headlines. Higher quality companies, represented by the WCA High Quality Index, are outperforming lower quality companies, represented by the WCA Low Quality Index, by about 5% year-to-date. It seems investors may be starting to demand higher return for risk.

Markets have been driven higher by surging profits, bolstered by surging investment in AI. Even before the troubles in the Middle East became front page news, there were signs that the credit cycle was set to turn. As more companies rely on credit to finance the AI capital spending Supercycle, the AI-Credit nexus has become central to where markets go from here. The next few months will allow companies to show investors how they intend to manage the cycle. 

As we have said before, the quality cycle has grown long in the tooth as the past three years’ market returns have been dominated by companies with above average risk and lower quality. We believe the right play now is for investors to look to high quality businesses that are flexible, durable, and predictable. Low debt, profitable assets, and consistency should help in the months ahead. A steady and well covered dividend is also helpful to build a solid portfolio with good defense and offense. 

Kevin R. Caron, CFA
Senior Portfolio Manager
973-549-4051

Chad Morganlander
Senior Portfolio Manager
973-549-4052

Steve Lerit, CFA
Head of Portfolio Risk
973-549-4028

Eric Needham
External Sales and Marketing
312-771-6010

Matthew Battipaglia
Portfolio Manager
973-549-4047

Jeffrey Battipaglia
Client Portfolio Manager
973-549-4031

Suzanne Ashley
Internal Relationship Manager
973-549-4168