Today, The Wall Street Journal ran a front-page, above-the-fold article titled “Dividend Darlings Trail Stock Market Despite Pumped-Up Yields.” The authors point to underperformance by dividend payers within the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats index, an equally weighted index consisting of all S&P 500 companies that have increased dividends every year for the past 25 consecutive years. The article highlights some iconic dividend payers with large yields suffering large share price drops this year. So says The Wall Street Journal: “Exxon Mobil Corp., whose dividend yield is sitting at a near-record of more than 10%, has declined 51% in 2020… AT&T Inc., with a dividend yield of more than 7%, has fallen 29%… And Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., offering a nearly 5% dividend yield, has plummeted 35%…”

The article goes on to say that $40 billion has been pulled from global dividend-focused mutual and exchange-traded funds in 2020, according to data from EPFR. Oil price swings, COVID-19 impacts, and worries over potentially large loan losses at banks all contributed to dividend stock troubles.

Not Surprising

Dividend troubles amid high yielding stocks are not surprising to us, as we look at value and dividend investing differently than traditional value managers. Unlike conventional value managers, who tend to focus on multiples of earnings or book value, along with dividend yield, we focus on a growing intrinsic value. Intrinsic value is rooted in cash flow, risk, profitability, and managerial investment decisions. Multiples of book value, for example, have little, if any, bearing on wealth creation. Our interest in dividend growth only matters as such growth provides something of a signal that a company’s management expects growth to persist into the future, but, in our view, dividends are never a reason for buying a stock, per se.

Paying a certain dividend out of uncertain earnings can’t make earnings any less risky. And, if dividends are paid when they shouldn’t be, then penalties arise. By paying dividends, a company has less money available to fund growth. If debt or equity is raised to replace the dividend, then shareholders are diluted as new claims on future cash flow are also created. To the extent that firms engage in aggressive debt issuance to finance dividends, rising leverage can also increase future default probability — never a good outcome for stock investors.

Bird In Hand

Sometimes dividends are described as a “bird in hand.” This theory says that investors should value a dollar of dividends today higher than uncertain capital gains in the future. But does a dividend make a stock less risky to own? Isn’t a bird in the hand (a dividend) worth two in the bush (a capital gain)? Hardly! Dividends paid are capital gains lost for sure because a firm’s value immediately declines by the amount of the dividend. That cash is gone from the books of the firm forever, thereby reducing value and potential capital gains. Again, the mere act of paying a certain dividend can never make a company’s business or earnings any more certain, and as already discussed, it can even lead to greater risk and uncertainty.

If you bought the highest yielding 10% of the Standard & Poor’s 500 index at the end of February, just before COVID-19 hit the United States hard, you would now own a portfolio down -10%, including dividend payments. A simple investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index would be up 18%. The resulting 28% underperformance shows how a “high yield” does not always mean the same thing as a “high return” and can very quickly turn into “high risk.”

Conclusion

Today’s cover story in The Wall Street Journal is yet another reminder of why a company’s profitability, quality, and flexibility matter most. A price multiple and a dividend yield are silent on all of these most important factors, and investors seeking safety should exercise caution when searching for yield.