Washington Crossing Advisors

 

You are subscribed as %%emailaddress%%
An Adobe Acrobat version of this document can be found here
Market Commentary
September 24, 2008
 

Downgrading Outlook Based on Credit Freeze

We have re-evaluated our portfolio posture in light of new information that suggests the current downturn in the economy may persist longer than even our original recessionary forecast.  We now know, based on new data from the Federal Reserve, that credit creation in the United States effectively seized in the second quarter as net new borrowing by households fell to $197 billion.  This level of credit creation is $750 billion less than a year ago and $1.2 trillion less than the peak levels seen two years ago.  Said another way, the current annualized growth rate in credit, at 1.4%, is the lowest growth rate for this statistic on record, with data going back to 1952.  Even those growth rates for government and business have slowed materially in recent quarters, leaving total borrowing growth near 3.5% — a level not seen since 1991.

In short, we believe that the massive increase in leverage from 2000-2006 that occurred at both the household level and within the financial system must now be reduced.  With aggregate U.S. household debt-to-income ratios near 140% and some large financial firms' asset leverage ratios near 30-40X equity, the current stresses in the economy now will likely require forced liquidation of assets over time that may result in further downward pressure on asset prices and may cause both corporate and individual borrowers to seek to adopt a more risk-averse, and more liquid, posture. 

While we had been hopeful that the current slump in the economy would follow earlier cycles, we now must confront the cold facts that directly point toward de-leveraging and asset price deflation.  As a result, we have adjusted our investment posture and recommended tactical asset exposure to recognize these new facts.  The changes made to our recommended allocations do three things:

Raise more cash:  Reduce portfolio risk exposure in light of the above facts and increase potential buying power in the event of further market declines.

More evenly distribute U.S. equity portfolio:  Create a more even distribution of U.S. common equity exposure by increasing the relative exposure to smaller and value segments of the markets within portfolios.  We also acknowledge the emerging leadership of small capitalization stocks in recent months, and we are recognizing the relative shift in valuations that have occurred between growth and value over the past year.

Reduce exposure to higher volatility foreign markets:  We are broadening our exposure within the developed markets and continue to avoid emerging and BRIC economies. 

Tactical Direction Still Tied to Credit

While we expected to see an improving credit environment by now, this is simply not the case.  Our original work on credit cycles, that suggests that economies and markets have become increasingly tied to trends in credit creation (versus traditional inventory adjustment models), remains valid in our view.  Therefore, we now are formalizing our analysis on credit trends and relating these trends to our tactical recommendations for asset allocation.  To help with this, we are introducing a new indicator for monitoring changes in credit markets and their impact on the economy.  This index combines a variety of forward-looking and real-time market inputs that we believe are relevant to today's credit conditions.  In short, it can be thought of as a thermometer that gauges whether the current credit environment is warming up or becoming more deeply frozen.  It also provides us with a quantitative and unbiased measure for assessing and benchmarking our overall equity exposure in the weeks and months ahead. 

We will refer to this diffusion-style indicator in the future as we discuss our top-down tactical asset allocation decisions.  As you can see from the chart below, the composite takeaway is that conditions remain more hostile to risk-taking at this time than during the 2003-2006 timeframe.  Further deterioration could suggest that even greater cuts in equity exposure are warranted, while improvement could suggest that additions to equity exposure are becoming more appropriate.  These observations will continue to be an important contributor to our overall outlook for financial markets given the special set of conditions now confronted by financial markets.

Credit Thermometer

There are many inputs to the index.  In general, they are designed to be relevant to today's highly unusual set of financial conditions.  The index seeks to take a week-to-week and month-to-month point of view rather than a day-to-day point of view.  In addition, the inputs are intended to give us forward-looking information that may directly impact the outlook for the economy and equity markets.  This index is a diffusion-style index comprised of several equally weighted components.  The components include:

Libor-OIS Spread: An indicator of the banking systems' ability to get short-term funding from one another.

Term Spread:  Represents the difference between long-term U.S. government interest rates and short-term cost of funding for banks.  A widening spread typically signals an improving environment for banks who traditionally seek to profit from "borrowing short" and "lending long."

Treasury / Moody's Baa Spread:  An indicator of credit risk among domestic industrial companies.

Homebuilders Index Relative Performance:  A market-based indicator focused on housing. 

Financial Sector Index Relative Performance:  A market-based indicator focused on banking and finance. 

Stock / Bond Relative Performance
:  A measure of sentiment and risk preference among investors. 

Trade-Weighted Performance of Dollar:  Measures perceptions about the health of the U.S. economy.

Weekly Jobless Claims:  A weekly indicator that reflects the health of the overall economy from the viewpoint of employment.

At present, we conclude that credit conditions remain poor.  We will continue to monitor these and other inputs and make changes accordingly to our recommended tactical asset allocation exposures in the weeks and months ahead.

Past Commentaries

 

September 15, 2008

Equity Markets Stumble on Lehman, Merrill, and AIG

More

September 9, 2008

No Change In Strategy On GSE Action

More

July 31, 2008

Quick Take on GDP Report

More

July 21, 2008

Valuation Are Better, But Markets Are Not Out of the Woods

More

May 20, 2008

Buy the Dips

More

March 10, 2008

Investing During Recession

More

January 22, 2008

Global Sell-off

More

December 27, 2007

Outlook 2008

More

December 7, 2007

NBER President Raises Recession Concerns

More

November 28, 2007

Equity Risk Heightened - Allocation Remains Defensive

More

September 25, 2007

After the Rate Cut

More

July 30, 2007

The Case For Growth

More

June 15, 2007

Data Affirms Tactical Asset Allocation Posture

More

March 19, 2007

Cutting Earnings And Equity Target

More
To unsubscribe, please click here.
Company Name, Address and Contact Details

The information contained herein has been prepared from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed by us and is not a complete summary or statement of all available data, nor is it considered an offer to buy or sell any securities referred to herein. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and do not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual investors. There is no guarantee that the figures or opinions forecasted in this report will be realized or achieved. Employees of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated or its affiliates may, at times, release written or oral commentary, technical analysis, or trading strategies that differ from the opinions expressed within. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There are special considerations associated with international investing, including the risk of currency fluctuations and political and economic events. Investing in emerging markets may involve greater risk and volatility than investing in more developed countries. Due to their narrow focus, sector-based investments typically exhibit greater volatility. Small company stocks are typically more volatile and carry additional risks, since smaller companies generally are not as well established as larger companies. Property values can fall due to environmental, economic, or other reasons, and changes in interest rates can negatively impact the performance of real estate companies. When investing in bonds, it is important to note that as interest rates rise, bond prices will fall. High-yield bonds have greater credit risk than higher quality bonds. The risk of loss in trading commodities and futures can be substantial. You should therefore carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. The high degree of leverage that is often obtainable in commodity trading can work against you as well as for you. The use of leverage can lead to large losses as well as gains. Indices are unmanaged, and you cannot invest directly in an index.

Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated | Member SIPC & NYSE | www.stifel.com

Stifel Nicolaus