Washington Crossing Advisors

 

You are subscribed as %%emailaddress%%
An Adobe Acrobat version of this document can be found here
Market Commentary
July 31, 2008
 

Quick Take on GDP Report


For those of you wondering why the Gross Domestic Product figures have been so resilient despite falling home sales, automobile sales, and employment, we want to offer the following observations about today's data.  (Today's report of second quarter GDP growth included a negative number for the fourth quarter of 2007, which is coincident with our March 10 Commentary where we posited that a recession began in the fourth quarter of last year.)

First, our concern has been that the consumer in the United States has become weakened because of falling employment, tighter credit, and a large debt overhang from the housing bubble.  The reason we are focused on what is going on inside the United States, is because much of the demand for goods and services produced around the world emanates from the consumer right here in the United States.  That is not to say demand conditions outside of the United States are not meaningful, but it is hard to envision a robust global economy when the engine of the largest economy in the world is not functioning properly.

The Gross Domestic Product, or GDP, figures produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis are designed to measure production and not demand.  Therefore, the headline numbers do not directly address our primary concern over slipping consumer demand.  According to Bernard Baumohl, executive director of the Economic Outlook Group, LLC, and author of "The Secrets of Economic Indicators," the data for "gross domestic purchases and for the GDP move in tandem — except for periods when the cost of imports surges.  That can happen when oil prices shoot up or if the dollar plummets in value, which automatically makes imports more expensive.  In such instances, gross domestic purchases turns out to be a better gauge."  These data points are contained within the GDP report itself, but to understand their computation requires a bit of explanation.
 

Gross Domestic Product
Measure Q2 2008 Q1 2008 Q4 2007 Q3 2007
Real Production 1.9% 0.9% -0.2% 4.8%
Real Purchases -0.5% 0.1% -1.0% 2.6%
Production Inflation 1.1% 2.6% 2.5% 1.5%
Purchases Inflation 4.3% 3.4% 2.7% 2.2%


Consider the chart above.  The headline statistics are real production (real GDP) and production inflation (GDP Deflator).  Those numbers currently show modest economic growth of 1.9% with low inflation of just 1.1%.  Even a casual observer of the economy might wonder what these figures are missing.  Where is the collapse in automobile demand?  Where is the credit crunch?  Where are the lost jobs?  It just doesn't square with what we commonly know about the economy's troubles lately.

Perhaps if we sharpen our focus on core demand in the United States by removing exports and inventory changes, we get a picture that many would agree more accurately reflects the current conditions.  Here we see that core consumer demand at home is a negative -0.5% while prices are up 4.3%.  That reality, in our view, more closely reflects the experience of the "man on the street" and not the "headline" figures on the economy. 

Perhaps more important is the fact that investors who have looked at the economy's trends in this light have been better able to spot the deterioration in the economy that has weighted on financial markets for most of the past year.

So while the Bureau of Economic Analysis' report on production shows growth, the crux of our issue has not been on the production side.  It has been on what happens to consumer demand both currently and prospectively.  A falling dollar will generally curtail growth in imports and strengthen exports.  A falling dollar and shifting trade balance is not necessarily a sign of strength but can be a result of weakness.  On the bright side, we are encouraged by the apparent drawdown in inventories, which is a potential harbinger of improved production trends looking out into future quarters.

Past Commentaries

 

July 21, 2008

Valuation Are Better, But Markets Are Not Out of the Woods

More


May 20, 2008

Buy the Dips

More

March 10, 2008

Investing During Recession

More

January 22, 2008

Global Sell-off

More

December 27, 2007

Outlook 2008

More

December 7, 2007

NBER President Raises Recession Concerns

More

November 28, 2007

Equity Risk Heightened - Allocation Remains Defensive

More

September 25, 2007

After the Rate Cut

More

July 30, 2007

The Case For Growth

More

June 15, 2007

Data Affirms Tactical Asset Allocation Posture

More

March 19, 2007

Cutting Earnings And Equity Target

More
To unsubscribe, please click here.
Company Name, Address and Contact Details

The information contained herein has been prepared from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed by us and is not a complete summary or statement of all available data, nor is it considered an offer to buy or sell any securities referred to herein. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and do not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of individual investors. There is no guarantee that the figures or opinions forecasted in this report will be realized or achieved. Employees of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated or its affiliates may, at times, release written or oral commentary, technical analysis, or trading strategies that differ from the opinions expressed within. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There are special considerations associated with international investing, including the risk of currency fluctuations and political and economic events. Investing in emerging markets may involve greater risk and volatility than investing in more developed countries. Due to their narrow focus, sector-based investments typically exhibit greater volatility. Small company stocks are typically more volatile and carry additional risks, since smaller companies generally are not as well established as larger companies. Property values can fall due to environmental, economic, or other reasons, and changes in interest rates can negatively impact the performance of real estate companies. When investing in bonds, it is important to note that as interest rates rise, bond prices will fall. High-yield bonds have greater credit risk than higher quality bonds. The risk of loss in trading commodities and futures can be substantial. You should therefore carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your financial condition. The high degree of leverage that is often obtainable in commodity trading can work against you as well as for you. The use of leverage can lead to large losses as well as gains. Indices are unmanaged, and you cannot invest directly in an index.

Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated | Member SIPC & NYSE | www.stifel.com

Stifel Nicolaus